Matt poured the selections out and numbered them from 1 - 8. He turned his back and I mixed them up (keeping track of the changes) and then we sampled. We rated each on a scale of 1 - 10 for flavor, aroma, head/carbonation and overall quality. Then we compiled the results and compared against our memory of brewing the batches. somewhat surprisingly we rated the partial mashes highest. And alcohol content was also a good predictor for which we preferred.
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Sposborth hearts APA
Matt poured the selections out and numbered them from 1 - 8. He turned his back and I mixed them up (keeping track of the changes) and then we sampled. We rated each on a scale of 1 - 10 for flavor, aroma, head/carbonation and overall quality. Then we compiled the results and compared against our memory of brewing the batches. somewhat surprisingly we rated the partial mashes highest. And alcohol content was also a good predictor for which we preferred.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
How much variance was there?
Sigma^2 was approx. 1.5. We did not compute the kurtosis...
How about the skewness?
Post a Comment